While the canvas and the old box febrile media have excited 
their characters on the hackneyed subject of "horseplay, ugly game" and, in this case, a set of m ... erde, play naughty! I focus on the first application of the Treaty of Lisbon. Yep! much less attractive, but far more fundamental to our collective destiny.
I was a fervent, passionate defender of the stillborn constitutional treaty, as to confuse me with some past affection, but I have always denounced the inconsistency process envisioned by leaders too sure because European: bringing twelve countries BEFORE you change institutions to suit the enlarged EU. This inconsistent cart before the horse has wasted a few years after the effective sovereign choice evolved into a referendum plebiscite failure. First act of a boondoggle orchestrated
for nothing: the European elections last June have not confirmed the support of the people for parties who had defended the rejection of the treaty. QED, you could just wait ... The image of José Bové phagocytosed by the truculent Cohn-Bendit completes the demonstration of an opportunistic position instead of an actual ex applicable canonists.
no better on the other side? Close to the thinking: it vegetate in confabulations opaque negotiating shameful that spoiling the original spirit of a lively two-headed incarnation with a new European ideal perspective. Because they are the heads of state and government who vote for President of the European Council and High Representative for foreign affairs, this franchise can take care of all the pretenses, the incredible pressure on the other, so-called low exchange courtesies
... Yes, section 9B of the Lisbon Treaty (I 22 rehash of the late Constitution) only uses the verb "elect" without associating the Democratic triptych, "universal, equal and secret, but it does allow the rulers to divert the minds of the election with voting haggling and compromise, thick? The "
majority" which refers to the treaty seems to focus more capacity conchier the first principles of every election that standard calculation.
Without commenting on the profile of Herman Van Rompuy and Baroness Ashton of Upholland, one can simply deplore the denial of absolute
democratic basis in the electoral process that led them to their respective positions.
As proposed by Thierry Chopin of the Robert Schuman Foundation (that's a personality
missing!), ECT would be beneficial to elect this president and this high representative elected by the parliaments of member states with respect secrecy of a vote not negotiable. That would restore the mouth to a Union that no longer seems have a purpose other than the management of petty interests. The Heads of State and Government finally appear the worst position to decide in conscience, and without being influenced by something other than their beliefs rooted, who should preside over the EU and conduct diplomacy. The cutesy
is what multiple instances of Europe, like a newly Barroso appetizingly in return for five years. No new breath to the Commission. No personality big enough to resist the inertia of the member states.
Meanwhile, I do not know what the crisis is global with his snub-nosed way, in the crosshairs, a set of states insolvent followed by a final implosion of the financial system.
While salopiots overpaid Baball continue to push with their feet, hands, ears, it distracts from a population of shenanigans and drama simmering ...
No Goal exciting, nothing to football: a nihilism effective tomorrow ... or even one! Absurd.
their characters on the hackneyed subject of "horseplay, ugly game" and, in this case, a set of m ... erde, play naughty! I focus on the first application of the Treaty of Lisbon. Yep! much less attractive, but far more fundamental to our collective destiny. I was a fervent, passionate defender of the stillborn constitutional treaty, as to confuse me with some past affection, but I have always denounced the inconsistency process envisioned by leaders too sure because European: bringing twelve countries BEFORE you change institutions to suit the enlarged EU. This inconsistent cart before the horse has wasted a few years after the effective sovereign choice evolved into a referendum plebiscite failure. First act of a boondoggle orchestrated
for nothing: the European elections last June have not confirmed the support of the people for parties who had defended the rejection of the treaty. QED, you could just wait ... The image of José Bové phagocytosed by the truculent Cohn-Bendit completes the demonstration of an opportunistic position instead of an actual ex applicable canonists. no better on the other side? Close to the thinking: it vegetate in confabulations opaque negotiating shameful that spoiling the original spirit of a lively two-headed incarnation with a new European ideal perspective. Because they are the heads of state and government who vote for President of the European Council and High Representative for foreign affairs, this franchise can take care of all the pretenses, the incredible pressure on the other, so-called low exchange courtesies
... Yes, section 9B of the Lisbon Treaty (I 22 rehash of the late Constitution) only uses the verb "elect" without associating the Democratic triptych, "universal, equal and secret, but it does allow the rulers to divert the minds of the election with voting haggling and compromise, thick? The "
majority" which refers to the treaty seems to focus more capacity conchier the first principles of every election that standard calculation. Without commenting on the profile of Herman Van Rompuy and Baroness Ashton of Upholland, one can simply deplore the denial of absolute
democratic basis in the electoral process that led them to their respective positions. As proposed by Thierry Chopin of the Robert Schuman Foundation (that's a personality
missing!), ECT would be beneficial to elect this president and this high representative elected by the parliaments of member states with respect secrecy of a vote not negotiable. That would restore the mouth to a Union that no longer seems have a purpose other than the management of petty interests. The Heads of State and Government finally appear the worst position to decide in conscience, and without being influenced by something other than their beliefs rooted, who should preside over the EU and conduct diplomacy. The cutesy is what multiple instances of Europe, like a newly Barroso appetizingly in return for five years. No new breath to the Commission. No personality big enough to resist the inertia of the member states.
Meanwhile, I do not know what the crisis is global with his snub-nosed way, in the crosshairs, a set of states insolvent followed by a final implosion of the financial system.
While salopiots overpaid Baball continue to push with their feet, hands, ears, it distracts from a population of shenanigans and drama simmering ...
No Goal exciting, nothing to football: a nihilism effective tomorrow ... or even one! Absurd.
0 comments:
Post a Comment